For land, partnerships and acquisition teams

Screen any UK plot in minutes. Walk away or bid with evidence you can defend.

Stop spending thousands and waiting 12 weeks to find out a site was never viable. Landbuyer AI reads your red line and gives you a clear view of the constraints, costs, values and residual in minutes.

Join the waitlist

Free to join. No credit card. We'll email you the moment early access opens.

Every claim, cited.

Source, date and confidence rating on every fact. Nothing shown as certain unless it is.

Built for the tender clock.

Designed around the pace of a competitive bid, not a leisurely desktop study.

Any UK plot, not a demo.

Draw a boundary anywhere in England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland and get a real read.

01 / The problem

You already know how this goes.

A site lands on your desk. The clock is already running, whether it's a tender deadline or a competing bid. Planning history is on the council's portal. Flood risk is on a different government site. Title is with Land Registry. Comparable sales are scattered across three more. None of it talks to the others, and none of it tells you what to conclude.

So you spend two or three days pulling it together by hand, or you commission a consultant and wait 6 to 12 weeks and pay thousands of pounds to get an answer that, most of the time, turns out to be no. By the time it lands, the site has often moved on without you.

And even when you do the work yourself, there's a harder problem waiting at the end of it: your technical director is going to ask where every number came from. "Indicative" isn't good enough when the offer price depends on it. A missed easement, a ransom strip, an undisclosed contamination trigger, or a planning history nobody checked closely enough, can wipe out a scheme's entire margin after you've already committed money to it.

The industry doesn't have a data problem. It has a synthesis problem.
Planning, title, flood, constraint and transport evidence connected to one red-line site boundary

02 / How it works

From plot to pitch-ready, in three steps.

One red line becomes one cited evidence trail, then one decision your team can explain.

A site boundary moving through evidence collection and interpretation to a decision
  1. 01

    1. Drop in the plot

    Search a postcode, upload a boundary file, or draw the red line straight onto the map. Works for a live tender site or a speculative approach, anywhere in the UK.

  2. 02

    2. Landbuyer builds the evidence

    Planning history, constraints, flood and environmental risk, title position, and comparable sales are pulled and checked against the confirmed boundary. Every fact carries its source, its publish date, and a confidence rating: verified, indicative, or purchase required. Nothing missing is ever shown as clear.

  3. 03

    3. Get the verdict, and the pitch

    An AI summary opens every section with the case for and against, citing only what's actually in the evidence. Add any fact to a report with one click, and let the report builder draft a viability pitch you can hand straight to your technical director or bid team.

03 / The evidence standard

Most tools show you a map. We show you an answer you can defend.

Map-and-data platforms are good at showing you layers: flood zones, listed buildings, planning applications, ownership boundaries. What they don't do is tell you whether the plot is worth pursuing, and they don't survive the follow-up question in the boardroom.

Landbuyer treats every fact on the page as a claim, not a decoration. Each one carries a named source, the date it was actually published (not the date we happened to fetch it), and one of three honest labels: verified against an authoritative source, indicative and clearly explained as such, or a purchase required to get a definitive answer. A dataset that hasn't returned a result is shown as unknown. It is never shown as "no risk found" because those are two completely different things, and confusing them is how schemes get bought on the wrong numbers.

That discipline is what turns a page full of data into a pitch your technical director will actually sign off.

Confirmed, indicative, or unknown.

Every status is one of five fixed states. Never a guess dressed up as a fact.

Sourced, not summarised from nowhere.

AI commentary can only cite facts already on the page. It cannot invent a data point.

Built to be checked.

A Harvard-style citations page lists what was received, what it was for, and where it came from, ready for scrutiny.

Six evidence streams converging on one red-line site decision screen
Decision-grade output. Evidence and uncertainty stay attached.

04 / Product

What you'll actually see.

01

The verdict, first

Every page opens the same way: the case for this plot, and the case against it, written in plain English and citing the evidence beneath. Read the verdict in ten seconds, then go as deep as you need.

Evidence, an amber recommendation and a red-line map joined into one decision
02

One map, every layer that matters

Gas and utilities, planning history, flood risk, listed buildings, conservation areas, green belt, market evidence and more, one layer at a time so the picture never turns to noise. Click anything on the map and a panel opens with what it is, how it relates to your red line, and where the information came from.

A red-line parcel map with planning, green-belt, flood, utilities and heritage layers separated above it, plus a selected feature linked to its source
03

Every source, in one place

A single page listing what was pulled, what it was for, and a working link or plain-English source description, sorted the way a technical director actually wants to check it.

An evidence ledger showing source category, publication date, confidence and working citation for every item
04

From evidence to pitch

Add any fact to a report with one click as you work. When you're ready, get an AI-drafted viability pitch built entirely from what you've collected, edit it, and send it on.

Verified evidence cards flowing into an editable two-page viability pitch with a site map, verdict and citations

05 / Built for the work

Whoever screens the site, this is built around your week.

01

Land manager / land buyer

You screen more sites than you'll ever bid on. Turn a two-to-three-day desktop exercise into an hour, and stop losing good sites to slower paperwork.

02

Partnerships / bid manager

Tender windows don't move for anyone. Get evidence-rich, bid-ready site insight inside a 4 to 8 week window, not after it's closed.

03

Land director / head of land

Every bid your team submits should be built on the same standard of evidence. Get a consistent, auditable read on every site, not one that depends on who ran the appraisal.

04

Technical / planning manager

Abnormals that surface after exchange are the ones that hurt. Get ground, flood, utilities and planning risk together before you commit budget to a full survey.

05

SME developer or land agent

You don't have a land department. Landbuyer gives a one-person operation the same due diligence a national housebuilder's team would run, at a fraction of the cost.

06 / Why now

The market isn't waiting for anyone to catch up.

Planning policy is moving faster than most desktop processes can track. Local plan allocations are shifting authority by authority, competitive tenders are being decided on evidence and deliverability as much as price, and margins are tighter than they've been in years. Teams that can screen faster see more of the market. Teams that can prove their evidence win more tenders. Neither of those gets easier by waiting.

07 / FAQ

Before you join

Early access

Stop waiting 12 weeks to find out a site was never worth it.

Join the waitlist and be first to get early access as we roll out across the UK.

Free to join. No credit card. We'll email you the moment early access opens.